#FREEOFFICE 2016 VS LIBREOFFICE FULL#

I am not sure what or how, but this is another little discrepancy. The suite also assumed ownership of the ODF and Microsoft Office file associations, which is not what I expected.Īnother surprise is that the Fedora installation read i686 in the format and even grabbed two 32-bit dependencies, even though I had downloaded the 64-bit versions.

#FREEOFFICE 2016 VS LIBREOFFICE FULL#

The program offers a full 30 day trial, after which you will need to buy the product, in case you’re happy with its performance and quality. Several small dependencies were quickly satisfied, and I had SoftMaker Office 2016 installed. 763), with the newer one hidden on the latter page.

Somewhat weirdly, the official download and the detailed instruction sections offer different versions for download (in my case. In the original piece, SoftMaker Office was kind of a dud, and it’s time to give it a full review. LibreOffice finally became suitable for use side by side with Microsoft Office, as far as decent document conversion and fidelity go, and every one of these products has seen a large number of major and minor number increments. We talked about this in the office suite competition article back in 2013, and a lot has changed since. However, there are quite a few office products for Linux: Kingsoft Office, SoftMaker Office, Calligra, standalone Abiword, some others, each offering a slightly different aesthetic and functional approach. But in essence, you’re either using LibreOffice – used to be OpenOffice – or maybe something else. Depending on how you look at it, the world of office suites for Linux is either very rich or very poor. As the rather obscure idiom says: the tailor (hence the cliche suit reference) always goes naked.

Freeoffice 2016 vs libreoffice